The Second Amendment
With all the stuff going on about gun control, I decided to read the Second Amendment To The Constitution.
”A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Before I get started, I have friends and acquaintances who agree with the NRA that changing any gun control law is against the Constitution. After reading the Second Amendment over and over again I have the following thoughts.
The first four words of the Second Amendment says: "A well regulated Militia." I understand I'm using my interpretation for the benefit of my beliefs, however, I choose to interpret "regulated" to mean there is a small opening to make changes to the gun laws to protect the majority of us.
For example, a "regulated Militia" would never want crazy people shooting a gun much less an assault weapon. Therefore, I believe major background checks of people who are nuts is not changing the Constitution.
At the time the Second Amendment was written, all people including Kids were needed to protect against a potential police state. Kids today are different than they were back in 1776. Kids have evolved over the last three hundred plus years. Kids today are more interested in making money and doing business deals.
I get the NRA argument that some Kids today like to hunt and should be able to buy a hunting rifle. I get the NRA argument that some kids today want to have protection and should be able to buy a gun.
However, the founding fathers never envisioned an eighteen-year-old running around with an assault weapon that with one press on the trigger tens of bullets will be flying who knows where. Even Trump stated that we should consider raising the age limit to buy an assault weapon to twenty-one. The NRA's response is that they will help Trump to change his mind.
Lastly, our founding fathers lived in a world where law and order was iffy. There were threats that bad guys could create a police state and therefore it was necessary for everyday people to have guns to protect "the security of a free State."
In my opinion, the majority of gun loving people today have the same fear. The issue I have with that thinking is guns are useless if the government decides to create a police state.
Governments today have planes and bombs. Governments today have heat seeking missiles. Governments today have satellites to pinpoint who to kill. Governments today have armed drones that can kill hundreds just by someone, on the ground, pressing a button. The founding fathers never envisioned these kinds of weapons.
To my point, in the last week hundreds of people in Syria were killed by bombs and fire from drones. Many of the people who were killed had guns and assault weapons, but they were useless against those weapons.
I don't know for sure, but, I believe the gun people would argue everybody should be able to buy bombs and people killing drones. Their fear of being overrun by the government is so strong, they would put weapons of mass destruction in the hands of everyone including Kids.
Again, after many reads of the Second Amendment, I just don't buy the NRA's argument.